Are you getting enough oxygen? |
So it was awesome to be able to talk to him about the book. But rather than go the typical route of "why did you decide to write this book" and so forth (not that there's anything wrong with that), we decided to veer left, with me doing my best Space Ghost impression, while Dave did his best, um, Space Ghost's guest impression. Hopefully you find it entertaining!
Jeremy: Ignoring the fact that you have published two other books, Not Quite So Stories is your first book. What made you feel like a short story collection was the way to go right now?
David: The hypnogerms are the most likely explanation. I never should have eaten those ribs after that Gatlin Brothers concert in Branson. It's either that or the fact that this one is a short story collection. It being what it is, I kind of had to go with that. Trying to con people into thinking it was a novel would probably get me into trouble again. Besides, after doing a novel in story form and a novel, why not complete the circuit? Actually, I started work on the stories in here before the other two books had come together. It only came together and found a home after, so the timing is kind of coincidence. Or…is it?
Jeremy: There
are a number of stories in here—I’m too lazy to count so let’s say 23. Out of
those 23, if people could only read 1, which story would that be?
David: "G-Men." That's the first story in the collection, all about the Skydiving Security Administration screening jumpers during freefall to keep us all safe. That's what you mean by "only read 1," right?
Jeremy: Yes, that is correct. Smart idea starting with your favorite story first. I've always thought it was better for a book to start horribly and get better so that by the end, you think you've read something decent, but there could be merits to your approach.
Now obviously the title was influenced by Kipling’s Just So Stories. Any fear of a backlash when people see that there aren’t any stories about how a penguin got its spots?
Now obviously the title was influenced by Kipling’s Just So Stories. Any fear of a backlash when people see that there aren’t any stories about how a penguin got its spots?
David: What do
you mean? They're ALL about that. That's all any story is about, just like Great Expectations.
Jeremy: I felt like there was an undercurrent of
bias against dead people in the book—you seem to take a hard stand against them
haunting dreams, frown upon them renting apartments, and I am sure there is
more in the subtext. Was this intentional?
David: I think
that's a bias of the characters as opposed to the book itself. "Dreams of
Dead Grandpa" wouldn't be much of a story if the Grandpa wasn't haunting
the characters dreams, and similar but obviously different regarding apartment
rentals to the deceased in "Turndown Service." Since it's a pivotal story
element in those tales, I'd say the book was actually in favor of dead people
doing those things, opinions of the relevant characters notwithstanding.
Though, as a living person I have to acknowledge that I probably have a bias
towards being alive and that could color how I see the world.
David sees dead people--and hates them. |
Jeremy: Speaking of subtext, shouldn’t the author
just come out and say what they want to say and beat us over the head with it
so we get the message clearly?
David: Absolutely. Subtext should be as overt and overstated as possible. It's the actual
text that should only be hinted at and hidden in multiple shades of subtlety.
The story in the collection "Cents of Wonder Rhymes with Orange"
(centering on a dropped orange that inexplicably and repeatedly rolls uphill)
is a lot like Eyes Wide Shut in that way. Then again, I might be
confusing things again. I can never keep Eyes Wide Shut and Point
Break straight.
Jeremy: Point
Break is the one where Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman get naked and rob banks.
Speaking of the movie business, films often claim to be “based on a true story”
when only the germ of the idea is true. Did you consider labeling Not Quite So
Stories the same way?
David: Many of
the stories in this book were influenced by the central Discordian text Principia Discordia, particularly
"The Boys of Volunteer Fire Two-Twenty-Two-Point-Five (and a Half)"
(dealing with volunteer firefighters who are a little too volunteer and our
uncertainty about the specific nature of our reality). In fact, the epigraph is
a quote from the Princip. As such, I think the best way to respond to this
question is to quote from the excerpt from an interview of Malaclypse the
Younger in that book:
GP: Is Eris true?
M2: Everything is true.
GP: Even
false things?
M2: Even false things are true.
GP: How can that be?
M2: I don't know man, I didn't do it.
Jeremy: We know
from your book, The Garden of Good and Evil Pancakes, that Village Inn is your
go to place for breakfast. So what is your third favorite place to order
pancakes?
David: I have a terrible time picking favorites.
Like picking a favorite story from this collection, it changes all the time
based on different factors. Some days it might be "Last Known Sighting of
the HMS Thousand Thread Count Sheets" because I like the idea of trying to
rationally approach something as irrational as a bedroom floor suddenly being
liquid, whereas on other days it might be "Monkey! Monkey! Monkey! Monkey!
Monkey!" simply because cymbal monkeys are both funny and creepy. It's the
same with pancakes. I go to Village Inn, Denny's, Perkins, Pete's Kitchen,
McCoys Restaurant, 11-Worth Cafe, Lisa's Radial Cafe, Breakfast King, Great Scotts
Eatery, and more. I eat a lot of pancakes. Ranking is difficult.
Jeremy: It is clear that your mind is very fertile,
and so one could view your stories as the “crop” from that mind. Any thoughts
on that metaphor? Is it as hackneyed as it sounds?
David: I think "crop" would imply a much
more linear, coherent phenomenon than would be applicable for what goes on
inside my head. Sometimes things are straightforward and logical, but more
often there are leaps that leave me completely mystified as to how I got from
the beginning to the end of things. "Context Driven" arose from a day
when I tried to get into my car in a parking lot and my key wouldn't open the
door, because it was another Toyota of the same color (though a Camry instead
of a Corolla). I wondered about what would happen if my key had worked and I
had then become the person who owned that car. However, "Home
Improvement" was much more like: Mix eggs, flour, and milk in a large
mixing bowl. Place in a 3/4 inch cake pan. Bake on high for 2 hours. Take a
left at Dodge Street just before 72nd and shake well before attempting to
operate any heavy machinery lasting longer than four hours. I think this is
a much more apt, albeit much more confusing, metaphor for how the stories in
this collection came to be born.
Jeremy: I don’t want to spoil the ending of the book
for everyone, but what made you decide to kill off every character?
David: Presuming the above as true, which my
attorney has advised me from either confirming or denying, along with presuming
that I have an attorney as opposed to having made him up entirely as well, it
was self-defense. I admit nothing.
Jeremy: But do you admit that you admit to nothing?
Never mind. Is there anything that would make you stop writing?
This is Rayon fabric. Are we sure it's not evil? |
Jeremy: When compared to pancakes, would it be fair to say that waffles and crepes are a waste of batter? Isn’t the pancake the form that all batter should aspire to take?
David: Though I personally prefer pancakes, I think all of the stories in this collection would remind one not to get caught up on the forms with which we process reality. The map is not the territory, convictions cause convicts, and all that. After all, waffles are just conformist pancakes…and I'll admit to being fond of wandering around Paris with a fresh crepe full of ham and melted cheese.
Jeremy: In Bones
Buried in the Dirt, your first book, it is very clearly a unified story
that came together somewhat haphazardly. Was Not Quite So Stories created in a
unified way with the stories being somewhat haphazard?
David: Actually, no two of these stories came about
in the same way. Some came about before I ever had the collection, and some
after once I had a general plan I was pursuing. Some were spawned out of odd
things that happened throughout my life or odd thoughts I had, but others came
from some odd and dim recess completely inside my head. They all follow a
certain theme, but each very different from each other and their origins
reflect that.
Jeremy: Besides me, was there a writer out there
where you read their work and said, “I want to do everything the opposite of
them.” Again, besides me.
David: I don't
think there's anyone I'd want to be completely opposite of. I read a lot of
different kinds of authors and works. Balzac, Amelia Gray, Murakami, Bukowski,
Etgar Keret, Kerouac, Harper Lee, J.D. Salinger, Stephen King, Clive Barker,
Irvine Welch, Joyce Carol Oates, Flannery O'Connor, Palahniuk, Dostoyevsky, and
so on. The rare few authors that write in ways where I wouldn't do a thing differently
aren't people I'd follow after since they've already done a better job than I
would. The rare few authors I'd completely oppose wouldn't probably interest me
enough to oppose them. Everyone else, the vast majority, do some things I like
and some things I don't. I try to pick up what I consider the good and do
differently what I didn't care for.
Thus concludes part one of our interview! Stay tuned to see if David actually sticks around for part two, or wisely walks out faster than Cam Newton at a press conference!
Thus concludes part one of our interview! Stay tuned to see if David actually sticks around for part two, or wisely walks out faster than Cam Newton at a press conference!
Great interview--can't wait to read the book.
ReplyDeleteEnjoyed the interview-look forward to part two.
ReplyDelete